Do

the Masters of Associativity recommend:
Avoid to create a keyword from very common but quite meaningless words like »the« or »a« – until you have something really good to write about it.

Okay, but here's the thing – where would langage be without all these gluing words? there wouldn't be much meaning, or at least not much without them.

do, is one half of i do – the wedding vow – tell me that that it has no power? no meaning? no place in this blaster?

also, what has being particularly good got to do with validity in this thing – not only is good or bad subjective – but it is also sorely lacking, in my opinion. With free reign people can make any association positive or negative – it doesn't have anything to do with quality or just popularlity, or whim.

i say, let the associations run free, or put some stronger criterion on what you expect – because a lot of what goes on in here is drivel – which is okay if you expect it – also, it makes the gems shine brighter.

there's sense,

and then there's sensibility.

just because its ubiquitous doesn't make it unimportant

quite the contrary, it think

Do, Re, Mi, Fa, Sol, La, Ti, Do

if you want things to be done. Do it and it will be done.

Use it up. Wear it out.
Make it do or do without.

Do this, do that, I always have to do something. Maybe someday I will not have to do anyhting.

Do as I say, not as I do, and practise what I preach.